Provision 29 requires the Board to declare that its material controls are effective. What specific evidence supports that declaration?

The 2024 UK Corporate Governance Code asks boards to declare the effectiveness of material internal controls, for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2026. That declaration needs a register where principal risks, controls, testing and incidents are linked, not a slide assembled for the audit committee.

Who this page is for

  • FTSE 250 and FTSE 350 companies
  • AIM companies
  • Companies preparing to list

Typically 100 to 1,000 employees, established and regulated, with the risk register, supplier oversight and resilience work still run largely by hand.

What you are asked to show, and where ERM+ holds it

UK Corporate Governance Code 2024, Provision 29

What it asks

A board declaration on the effectiveness of material internal controls, and a description of how the board monitored and reviewed them.

What ERM+ holds

Material controls linked to the risks they address, with owners, test results and deficiencies recorded as they happen.

Provision 28: principal and emerging risks

What it asks

A robust assessment of principal and emerging risks, and how they are managed or mitigated.

What ERM+ holds

Principal and emerging risks with appetite, ratings, trends and actions, reported to the board from live data.

AIM Rules and the Corporate Governance Code

What it asks

For AIM companies, a recognised governance code applied and explained, including risk management and internal control.

What ERM+ holds

A proportionate risk framework that grows with the company, without an enterprise GRC price tag.

Operational and supplier resilience

What it asks

Confidence that key suppliers and systems can fail without taking the business with them.

What ERM+ holds

Suppliers, systems and incidents linked to the risks and processes they affect, so dependencies are visible to the board.

A summary to frame the conversation, not legal advice. The first call establishes exactly which requirements apply to your firm.

When the audit committee asks which controls are material, where does the answer come from?

  • The declaration is personal to the board

    Directors will want to see how the controls they are declaring effective were tested, not a summary built the week before.

  • Principal risks drift from reality

    A principal risks table refreshed once a year loses its link to the incidents and control failures that happened in between.

  • Growth outpaces the spreadsheet

    New sites, suppliers and systems add risk faster than a manual register can absorb it.

Who usually owns this

CFO

Also: Finance Director

What you are dealing with
You own risk oversight and vendor management alongside liquidity and capital, without a full risk team behind you.
What ERM+ gives you
Loss events and risk scenarios quantified in financial terms, so you can see how much capital keeps the business running when things go wrong.
Usually prompted by
Headcount cost, a supervisory finding, or a loss event that needs quantifying.

Built by practitioners, priced below enterprise GRC

More than 50 years of risk experience between the co-founders and over 500 with our senior associates. Implementation in weeks, not months.

Meet the team

“ERM PLUS significantly reduced the time and resources for achieving regulatory compliance in risk and prudential management.”

Head of OpRisk · Asset Management Firm

“The expertise and professionalism of the ERM Plus team are unparalleled. Their strategic guidance and hands-on approach have been instrumental in achieving our business goals.”

Head of Risk · Retail Brokerage Firm

Twenty minutes will tell us both whether there is anything worth exploring.

We look at what you capture today, what your regulator will ask for, and whether there is a gap. If there is nothing there, no need to take it further.

A gap check, not a pitch. No project, no budget conversation, no access to sensitive data.